Showing posts with label NY Economy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NY Economy. Show all posts

09 March 2009

Do you pay the same taxes as Trump? You Might be Surprised.





How much do you have to make to be in the top tax bracket in NY?

Watch the video to find out:




Shocked? You should be.

Because while President Obama works to make America's taxes fairer, New York's tax code is anything but. Over the last 30 years, the rich have seen their state taxes cut in half. Today, nurses and firefighters pay the same state tax rate as Wall Street tycoons.

It's more than unfair--with the state facing a $14 billion budget gap, it's just madness.

By asking the wealthy to pay their fair share in taxes, we could help balance the budget in a “balanced” way and prevent billions in cuts to classrooms, hospitals, and the elderly and disabled that Gov. Paterson has proposed.

The Facts:

Today, for a single filer, the top New York State personal income tax rate of 6.85% starts on adjusted gross income over $20,000 per year. That means a NYC police officer making $40,361 is in the same tax bracket as former Merrill Lynch CEO John Thain, who made $83.1 million in 2007. You can see the complete New York State personal income tax schedule from the department of taxation here (pdf)

Over the last 30 years, New York has cut its top income tax rate more than 50%, the majority of which went the wealthiest New Yorkers who needed tax relief the least. In the 2008 - 09 budget year, those cuts will cost the state nearly $20 billion in revenue - money we could use to keep hospitals open and schools thriving in tough times (Source: Fiscal Policy Institute).

There's a better way. The Working Families Party and our allies in the Fair Share Tax Reform coalition are fighting to modestly raise income taxes on those who can most afford it to help offset some of the Governor's most painful cuts.

Polls show it's a popular idea, especially once people realize how regressive New York's taxes have become. In the meantime, please vote on where YOU think the top tax rate should begin & we'll send the answers to Albany. Cast Your Vote HERE.

To learn more, check out our resources page.





LET THE REVOLUTION BEGIN!

Thanks for all you do!
Live
your values. Love your country.
And, remember: TOGETHER, We can make a DIFFERENCE!

FAIR USE NOTICE: This blog may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

04 March 2009

Another one Bites the Dust.

Crain's NY
by: Miriam Kreinin Souccar

photo: ALANE GOLDEN, c. 2009.

March 04, 2009 3:28 PM

Premier NY Prop Rental Company to File for Bankruptcy.

Buckled by the recession and other factors, Props for Today will seek protection from its creditors. The prop supplier owes $900,000 in back rent.

Props for Today, a 28-year-old prop house that supplies furnishings for productions like 30 Rock and Saturday Night Live, is expected to file for bankruptcy protection in the next week or so, a victim of the deepening recession, last year’s writers’ strike, and the loss of a state tax break.

The impending bankruptcy was disclosed in a bankruptcy filing by Props for Today’s parent company, Interieurs Inc., on Tuesday. Another of Interieurs’ companies, Props for Yesterday, is also expected to file for bankruptcy protection soon.

Dyann Klein, owner of the companies, is seeking to reorganize after a particularly difficult period.

The decrease of film making and television in New York, which began with the writers' strike and has continued and been escalated by the loss of the tax incentives, has impacted everybody in this industry," Ms. Klein said. “I believe I will be able to implement necessary changes in reorganization in Chapter 11 and emerge as a much stronger, healthy company that will continue to be the leader in prop rentals in the industry for years to come.

Props for Today is one of the premier prop rental companies in New York City. Given the ups and downs of the local production industry, it diversified into new businesses over the years, like renting out furniture for weddings and special events.

The last month has been especially hard for New York’s TV and film production businesses because the state’s tax incentive program ran out of money. No pilots were filmed in New York , and the city has already lost one television series, Fringe, which is relocating production to Vancouver.

According to Interieurs’ Chapter 11 filing, the company owes about $900,000 in rent on its 83,000-square-foot space on W. 34th Street to Vornado, its landlord.

Annual rent on the property is about $1.5 million. In December, Vornado initiated a non-payment proceeding against Interieurs in the Civil Court of the City of New York, seeking possession of the premises, according to the filing.


LET THE REVOLUTION BEGIN!

Thanks for all you do!
Live
your values. Love your country.
And, remember: TOGETHER, We can make a DIFFERENCE!

FAIR USE NOTICE: This blog may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

03 March 2009

Class Warfare: The Rich Strike Back.

The Business Council. The Real Estate Board. The Rent Stabilization Association. Ever hear of these groups? Probably not - they prefer to operate behind the scenes to keep taxes low and rake in the dough. Their latest move is to go on the offensive against the Working Families Party. It's a two pronged assault on our hard work: First, with a political mailing, as reported in the Daily News1, and second with a top-secret political memo written by Montgomery Burns.


That's right. A fictional character from The Simpsons is now crafting strategy for opponents of Fair Share Tax Reform.

It's simple, really. We either fix the tax code so that the wealthiest New Yorkers pay a little bit more, or we ask the middle- and working classes to shoulder the burden. The second choice will mean more crowded classrooms, hospitals closures, an even tougher life for our elderly and disabled citizens and hundreds of other essential public services starved of funds.
We support the first option - shared sacrifice.

On Thursday, we're taking it to the streets. Tens of thousands of New Yorkers will march in cities from Long Island to Buffalo to demand that the wealthy share the burdens of the economic crisis.

Rallies are taking place across the state. Can you attend?

I want the details.
No, I can't make it.

Our campaign is gaining steam, with huge majorities supporting our Fair Share Tax Reform.2 To win though, we need to see you at the rally this Thursday, March 5th. Read what Montgomery Burns has to say about it:

Burns' Memo


Date: 2/26/09
From: Montgomery Burns
To: Fellow Fatcats
Re: Fair Share Tax Reform


Rich people didn't get us into this mess. Ok, maybe we did. But that doesn't change the facts: Taxes are for the little people.
New York is facing a $14 billion budget deficit. To close it, the Governor proposed shutting down hospitals, laying off thousands of teachers and shredding social services. It's a fine plan.

But now, the commoners think they have a better idea. According to our sources, tens of thousands of them will 'rally' across the state demanding that (I can hardly type it!) the rich pay their fair share in taxes instead.

They must be stopped. It's our duty to ensure no one attends or hears about these rallies. We are calling on you, our most loyal supporters, to do all you can to keep attendance down and press coverage nonexistent.

If the media reports that people are angry, their legislators may start asking dangerous questions, like: why does the state's highest tax bracket start at just $20,000 a year?

So, my friends, I'm counting on you. Keep attendance low at the rallies with the help of a media blackout, don't let your chauffeur take the day off, and consider throwing more money at politicians to get them to see things our way.


Sincerely,

Montgomery Burns
Billionaires Against Really Fair Taxation (BARF-Tax)

We hope you can join us this Thursday and help defeat Mr. Burns and his corporate lobbyist friends. Either way, let us know:

I want the details.
No, I can't make it.

Thank you,

Charles Lenchner
Director of Online Organizing, WFP

* The rally in Melville, Long Island is taking place on Friday, March 6th.

Notes:
1 http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dailypolitics/2009/02/anti-millionaires-tax-mail.html
2 "Voters continue to overwhelmingly support increasing the personal income tax on millionaires - 77-19 percent - to close the budget gap, and 59 percent support an income tax increase on those making more than $250,000 a year," The Siena Institute, 2/24/09 http://www.siena.edu/uploadedFiles/Home/Parents_and_Community/Community_Page/SRI/SNY_Poll/09%20February%20SNY%20Poll%20Release%20--%20Final.pdf


LET THE REVOLUTION BEGIN!

Thanks for all you do!
Live
your values. Love your country.
And, remember: TOGETHER, We can make a DIFFERENCE!

FAIR USE NOTICE: This blog may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

01 March 2009

N.Y.: Ask your state senator to co-sponsor groundbreaking medical marijuana bill.



N.Y.: Ask your state senator to co-sponsor groundbreaking medical marijuana bill!

Dear New Yorker:

For the first time, "same as" (or identical) medical marijuana bills are being introduced by members of the majority party in both the Assembly, by Health Committee chair and longtime sponsor Asm. Richard Gottfried (D), and the Senate, by Health Committee chair Sen. Tom Duane (D). While the New York Assembly has passed medical marijuana legislation twice in the last two years, the bills died in the Senate. With new Senate leadership, this could finally be the year New York protects medical marijuana patients. Help us make sure this opportunity doesn't slip away.

Please call to urge your state senator to co-sponsor Sen. Duane's bill. Then, ask your friends and family to do the same. The bill will be introduced by the middle of next week, so don't delay!

If you are a patient with a serious medical condition, a physician, or a clergy member, please e-mail me at NMamber@mpp.org if you would be willing to speak out.

Numerous studies show that medical marijuana can be an effective treatment for patients with serious illnesses like cancer, multiple sclerosis, and AIDS. 76% of New Yorkers support allowing medical marijuana, as does the vast majority of the state's medical community. Yet, thousands of patients continue to suffer, living in fear of arrest, and sometimes facing prosecution and conviction. Others will not break state law and suffer needlessly because the medicine they know would work best is not allowed in their state. You can read and, in some cases, watch 17 New York patients' stories.

In this year of change, please call to urge your senator to join the growing national consensus and co-sponsor this legislation so that medical marijuana patients from Buffalo to Montauk can live their lives without fear of prison.

Thank you for supporting the Marijuana Policy Project. And please pass this on to friends and family in New York so that even more voices for compassion can be heard.

Sincerely,

Noah Mamber

Noah Mamber
Legislative Analyst
Marijuana Policy Project


LET THE REVOLUTION BEGIN!

Thanks for all you do! Live your values. Love your country. And, remember: TOGETHER, We can make a DIFFERENCE!
FAIR USE NOTICE: This blog may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

10 February 2009

Paterson provides $2B to buoy jobless.

February 10, 2009 5:15 PM

Officials will release $2 billion more in unemployment insurance funds to address the recent spike in jobless claims; more than 420,000 New Yorkers are on the dole.

(AP) - Gov. David Paterson and legislative leaders have agreed to release $2 billion more in unemployment insurance funds to deal with a spike in claims.

New unemployment claims have doubled to a weekly average of about 25,000 from about 12,500 a year ago. There are now more than 420,000 New Yorkers receiving benefits. That's up 175,000 from last year's average.

Mr. Paterson and the lawmakers needed to agree on additional funding to avoid running out of money for benefits by the end of the fiscal year March 31.

Workers and employers won't pay more in payroll deductions. The money will come from the federal Unemployment Insurance Trust Fund.

The average weekly benefit is $309 and, because of a recent federal change, can be received for up to 59 weeks after a new claim.


LET THE REVOLUTION BEGIN!

Thanks for all you do!
Live your values. Love your country.
And, remember: TOGETHER, We can make a DIFFERENCE!

FAIR USE NOTICE: This blog may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


15 January 2009

Notable NYC News: 15 Jan. 2009.

January 15, 2009 3:43 PM
Original Post: ABC News
By: RUSSELL GOLDMAN

US Airways Jet Crashes Into Hudson River off New York City



Flight 1549 Went Down After Being Struck by Birds.

Some 150 people aboard a US Airways plane en route to Charlotte, N.C., from New York City were rescued today in a lightning-fast effort following the jet's crash into the frigid waters of the Hudson River off the West Side of Manhattan.

All passengers and crew aboard were reported safe after New York City firefighters and ferries rushed to the aid of the US Airways jet, which floated in the river near the historic aircraft carrier The Intrepid.

US Airways flight 1549, an A-320 manufactured by Airbus, was carrying as many as 148 passengers and five or six crew members, according to the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey.

Only 30 seconds after takeoff at 3:26 p.m. ET, the pilot reported two bird strikes and said he wanted to return to LaGuardia Airport.

Controllers began giving him directions for return, but the pilot requested to land at the nearby Teterboro airport over New Jersey. The tower reportedly lost contact soon after that last transmission.

Commuter boats in the area were seen fishing people from the river, and rescuing passengers standing on the plane's wings after the crash.

ABC News' Robin Roberts, who saw the plane crash from her apartment window, said it appeared to be a controlled landing.

"It completely just hit the water full force, never bounced or anything like that, and came to a relatively quick stop," Roberts said. "But… it didn't skim along the water. There was very little trauma to the aircraft. It was… I'm still… can't believe what I saw."

The water temperature in the river was reported at 40 degrees, just above freezing.

John Ostrom of the Metropolitan Airports Commission out of Minneapolis chairs the Bird Strikes Committee, which advises the aviation industry on wildlife management to eliminate possible hazards.

"There's a variety of ways a bird can take down a plane," he told ABC News today. "There have been instances where birds the size of robins bring a plane down, all the way up to Canada geese."

Birds can fly into plane engines, shutting them down, or cause pilots to lose control of the plane by penetrating the windshield. And there's not much pilots can do to avoid bird strikes, which happen "every day," according Ostrom.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

January 15, 2009 8:33 AM
Original Post: Cranes NY
Photograph: A. Golden, eyewash design, c. 2005.

Riders to hold mock funeral for Z subway line.

The Metropolitan Transportation Authority is proposing to eliminate the subway line as part of an effort to combat a billion-plus budget deficit for 2009.

(AP) - New York City transit advocates are planning to hold a mock funeral for a subway line that could be eliminated under proposed budget cuts.

A bagpiper is expected to join members of the Straphangers Campaign on Thursday as they place a memorial wreath for the Z line at the Fulton-Broadway-Nassau station in Manhattan.

The Metropolitan Transportation Authority is proposing to eliminate the subway line as part of an effort to combat a billion-plus budget deficit for 2009. It has also said it would substantially raise fares.

More than 300 people crowded showed up at the Hilton New York Hotel for a public hearing Wednesday night held to talk about the proposals.

Members of the crowd protested the fare increases, especially a plan to double fares paid by Access-A-Ride disabled riders.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

January 15, 2009 8:21 AM
Illustration: A. Golden, eyewash design, c. 2007.

Mayor Bloomberg to reveal news jobs plan.


Mayor Michael Bloomberg's nine-point plan to create 400,000 jobs is one of several ideas he will present during a State of the City Address, Thursday.

(AP) - Mayor Michael Bloomberg was to outline a six-year plan to create 400,000 jobs during a State of the City speech focusing on economic recovery from the city's fiscal downturn.

The nine-point plan is one of several new economic ideas the billionaire former chief executive officer would present Thursday, according to people familiar with the speech. Themes of the annual address were described to The Associated Press on Wednesday by officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because the speech had not been given.

The job creation plan includes efforts to help small businesses, support for projects that create green jobs and a focus on capital investments that will yield work for residents.

Mr. Bloomberg on Wednesday spoke in broad terms about the city's dismal economic state and what the city would hear from him during the speech, which was expected to last more than an hour.

"We can't pray our ways out of this," he said. "We can't hope our ways out of it. We can't depend on things always breaking the right way to get us through it. We're going to have to have some reserves in case things don't go the way we think, in case things are worse."

Mr. Bloomberg has staked his campaign for a third term this year on his financial expertise and ability to guide the city through tough economic times.

He said Wednesday that he would not be unveiling any flashy new spending but would stick to initiatives that don't cost a lot of extra money.

Independent city budget analysts forecast in a report last week that the city will lose 242,700 jobs through the end of 2010. The report also projected that the budget gap for next fiscal year, which begins in July, has ballooned to $4.3 billion. In November, Mr. Bloomberg's prediction was $1.3 billion.

Among the points of the job creation plan is a proposal to reduce or eliminate the unincorporated business tax, helping ease the burden for 17,000 small business owners citywide, the officials said.

Aides said Mr. Bloomberg would seek to rise above the theme of doom and gloom in his speech on Thursday, instead turning to ways the city can get through the financial mess.

There will be plenty of time for bad news. The mayor will follow his State of the City address at the end of the month with a new budget plan, which is expected to contain new cuts and tax hikes.

"It will be very sobering to lay out the realities," he said Wednesday.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

January 15, 2009 11:42 AM
Photograph: A. Golden, eyewash design, c. 2005.

Most New Yorker's don't want 'Fat Tax' on soda.

A Quinnipiac poll reports 64% of registered New York voters oppose the governor's plan to help combat widespread obesity through an 18% tax on sugary drinks.

(AP) - Most New Yorkers are balking at Gov. David Paterson's proposal to impose a "fat tax" on sugary drinks, but an even larger majority wants millionaires to hand over a bigger share of their earnings to the tax collector, according to a new poll.

Quinnipiac University reported Thursday that 64% of registered voters oppose the governor's plan to help combat widespread obesity among children and others through an 18% tax on sugary drinks containing less than 70% real fruit juice. The poll shows 32% favor the soda surcharge.

"One month after Gov. David Paterson rolled out his fat tax proposal, and one week after he gave it a big push in his State of the State message, opposition is growing weightier instead of slimmer," said Maurice Carroll, director of the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute.

That compares with 60% opposition and 37% support in a December survey. Quinnipiac said it surveyed 1,664 voters from Jan. 8-12 and the new poll has a margin of error of 2.4 percentage points.

"One out of every four New Yorkers under 18 years of age is obese," Mr. Paterson said in his State of the State address last week. That blights their futures and creates a significant economic burden, he said, with New York spending $6.1 billion annually to treat obesity-related health problems.

Mr. Paterson's plan would ban trans fats in restaurants and junk food sales in schools. He would require chain restaurants statewide to post calorie content and establish a revolving loan fund to get healthy food markets in poor communities.

But the part of his plan that would add the surcharge on sugared drinks lacked poll support even among New York voters who prefer diet sodas, with 62% opposed and 35% in favor. Opposition was higher among those who drink sugared sodas, 72% against and 26% in favor.

Support for raising taxes on those with annual income more than $1 million a year stood at 80%, with 16% opposed. That drops to 73% support for higher taxes on incomes more than $500,000 a year, and 55% for incomes more than $250,000.

"We'd like to tax millionaires and even half-millionaires," Mr. Carroll said. "But the support begins to erode when we drop the high-tax level to $250,000, too close to home for many voters."

Mr. Paterson's 2009-2010 budget proposal would establish 88 new or higher fees or taxes, but he declined to embrace the Assembly Democrats' proposal to increase the income tax rate on New Yorkers with incomes $1 million or more a year.

The Quinnipiac survey found 53% of voters approve of the job Paterson is doing, with 25% opposed. They split 42-43% on his handling of the state budget, up from 40-46% last month.

Only 20% said they thought state lawmakers have the courage to make unpopular budget decisions, while 71% said they thought it would be "business as usual" in Albany.


LET THE REVOLUTION BEGIN!

Thanks for all you do!
Live your values. Love your country.
And, remember: TOGETHER, We can make a DIFFERENCE!

FAIR USE NOTICE: This blog may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

06 January 2009

Future of NYC: How bad will it get?

Future of NYC: How bad will it get?

To determine the impact of the current recession, it is instructive to look back at past economic downturns.

By:Greg David, Originally posted on Crain's, January 06, 2009 3:00 PM
Photograph: "Herman, once a tri-athelete, patiently awaits ANY public transportation in NYC this weekend..." A. Golden, eyewash design - c. 2006.

Editor’s note: This is the first in a series of stories on New York City’s economy, which is the focus of the upcoming Crain’s conference, The Future of New York City. Join the discussion here.

Understanding how bad the current economic crisis will be in New York requires a history lesson.

In the past four decades, New York has been engulfed by three major recessions:

-225,000 jobs were lost in the economic downturn the city suffered after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

-325,000 jobs were cut in the late 1980s and early 1990s.

-610,000 jobs disappeared in the disastrous 1970s.

The official forecasts—from the Bloomberg administration and city and state comptrollers—claim the current crisis will be less severe than any of the others. But comparing Wall Street today with manufacturing in the 1970s shows that is a debatable proposition.

Eight years ago, the national economy weakened before New York faltered. By the spring of 2001, Wall Street began retrenching, eventually shedding 35,000 jobs in the city. The terrorist attacks led to significant disruption but little permanent economic damage. A determined effort to bolster the tourism industry in the aftermath of Sept. 11 did much to lay the groundwork for a recovery. The boroughs outside Manhattan and the suburbs were little affected. The difficulties spanned four years; the rebound that began in 2004 was unexpectedly strong.

In the late 1980s, the nation also slipped into recession before New York. The city’s economy was undermined by a contraction on Wall Street brought about by the end of the 1980s bull market. The decline was deepened by three other major forces. A speculative real estate boom driven by tax breaks—not demand—led to overbuilding that took years to absorb. An expansion of government-financed jobs—on the city payroll as well as at social service and health care nonprofits—raised taxes so high that thousands of economically sensitive companies left, including Exxon and J.C. Penney. The crime wave fueled by crack cocaine led to 2,000 murders in one year and resulted in civic fear that delayed a recovery for years. The pain was felt in the entire region as Westchester, Long Island and the nearby counties of New Jersey all lost 9% of their employment base.

Hard times lasted seven years, and the recovery was anemic at first.

The disaster of the 1970s is remembered most for the fiscal crisis, the result of a misguided mission to turn the city into a welfare state. The government ran out of money because the effort coincided with the rapid erosion of the city’s manufacturing base—287,000 jobs were lost during the decade from what was then the city’s economic engine—while flight to the suburbs and beyond led to an unprecedented population decline of almost 900,000. Recovery, which took a decade, is remembered as very difficult, although the city’s comeback was able to continue despite two recessions in the rest of the country.

This time, there won’t be the population exodus of the 1970s. The unprecedented federal efforts to rescue the economy could help, too. Yet, one comparison may be more telling. The city seems certain to lose 50,000, or about 40%, of its Wall Street jobs. That’s a larger share than the roughly one-third of industrial jobs lost in the 1970s.


LET THE REVOLUTION BEGIN!

Thanks for all you do!
Live your values. Love your country.
And, remember: TOGETHER, We can make a DIFFERENCE!

FAIR USE NOTICE: This blog may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.